evaluation, measurement and verification (em&v)

Withholding Tax Both comparison-group approaches require a relatively large and homogeneous population of energy users. Enter your contact information to add or remove subscriptions, change your password, or … Both methodologies compare the energy use of a control group not involved in program activities with that of efficiency program participants. In general, program evaluations include market assessments, process evaluations, retrospective outcome/impact … h��V[O�8�+~��ۉt�TZ. Enter your contact information to add or remove subscriptions, change your password, or update your email address. Explore additional resources: Appendix C of the Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide presents key references that comprise a body of knowledge developed over the last several decades of energy efficiency program implementation and evaluation. The term measurement and verification (M&V) alone refers to project-level analysis associated with the documentation of energy savings and verification of installation at individual sites (more on that later under savings determination approaches). Next we describe the high-level steps for an impact evaluation process based largely on the SEE Action guide. For each measure, the TRM includes either specific deemed values or algorithms for calculating: In 2013, Delaware commissioned Optimal Energy to estimate how Delaware could potentially reduce usage of electricity, natural gas and unregulated fossil fuel. The QEM approach is more flexible and is more broadly applicable to programs. Policymakers and utilities in the US have recently put increased focus on energy efficiency as a clean, low-cost and reliable utility system resource and policy strategy to meet long-term energy needs and climate goals. Develops unit energy savings (UES) measures, standard protocols, and numerous guidelines. endstream endobj startxref

Here we briefly describe these initiatives and list some key resources. In general, the level of costs and stringency of EM&V should be commensurate with the magnitude of savings and the degree of uncertainty around existing estimates of savings. Social Media, Built by the Government Information Center

In recent years, the “common practice baseline” approach has received increased attention. Weather & Travel, Contact Us The simplest QEM approach is the pre/post method, which compares the energy use of program participants before and after the program; in effect, participants become their own control group. The RVF advocates that in designing energy efficiency cost-effectiveness screening tests, each state should adhere to several principles, including: For program administrators, typical costs for energy efficiency EM&V are 3-5% of annual portfolio budgets (based on data from the Consortium of Energy Efficiency). Spillover is when the program inspires participants or nonparticipants to take other efficiency actions not directly targeted by the program. An analysis by ACEEE examines details about state practices, precedents, and issues regarding net and gross savings (ACEEE 2014). Evaluators are interested in examining the extent to which variables external to a program may affect energy use and thereby lead to over- or underreporting of energy savings. 0 Includes definitions, concepts, and steps for calculating savings, avoided emissions, and other impacts. Of the two kinds of control groups, RCT tends to be more accurate in assessing savings, but it is time-consuming, expensive, and cannot be applied to full-scale programs because it requires random assignment to participant and control (nonparticipant) groups. Group of organizations and individuals (including ACEEE) working together to improve the way that utility customer-funded electricity and natural gas energy efficiency resources are screened for cost-effectiveness. The purpose of a Technical Resource Manual (TRM) is to provide a single, common reference document for estimating the energy and peak demand savings resulting from the installation of energy efficiency measures. cj]�>��/#�]'e�,���gt TRMs provide information primarily used for estimating the energy and demand savings of end-use energy efficiency measures associated with utility customer-funded efficiency programs. Aims to establish easy-to-follow protocols based on commonly accepted engineering and statistical methods for determining gross savings for a core set of commonly deployed energy efficiency measures. Confronting Climate Change: What Can I Do? The goal of this guide is to support the development, maintenance, and use of accurate and reliable. 4029 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<89F2D6FC11EC1940A71811199D03240D>]/Index[4015 49]/Info 4014 0 R/Length 87/Prev 1299828/Root 4016 0 R/Size 4064/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Works to develop and support the use of consistent savings assumptions and standardized, transparent guidelines and tools to evaluate, measure and verify, and report the energy and demand savings, costs, and avoided emission impacts of energy efficiency. Using definitions from DOE’s Uniform Methods Project (NREL 2014, Chapter 17): Free-riders are participants who would have adopted energy efficiency measures in the absence of the program. They include: Regulations Governing Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification Procedures and Standards (7 DE Admin Code 2105). State Regulations

The SEE Action guide describes three general approaches to savings determination: 1) measurement and verification (M&V); 2) deemed savings; and 3) large-scale consumption data analysis with the use of control groups. EM&V (Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification) is a catchall acronym for determining impacts of energy efficiency programs and projects. Evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V) is the collection of methods and processes used to assess the performance of energy efficiency activities so planned results can be achieved with greater certainty and future activities can be more effective.

The purpose of the conference is to provide a forum for the presentation, critique, and discussion of objective evaluations of energy programs. Here we provide more details about some specific elements of the EM&V process for further consideration. %PDF-1.6 %���� EM&V is the collection of approaches for determining and documenting energy and non-energy benefits resulting from end-use energy efficiency activities and programs.

A portfolio is a collection of programs that collectively address multiple technologies and market segments. See ACEEE 2015 for additional information.

Combi Boiler Price, German Sentence Structure Rules Pdf, Morattu Single Meaning In Tamil, How Did The Mcculloch Ruling Contribute To The Strength Of The National Government, R/o Medical Abbreviation, 91 Beach Plum Rd Narragansett, Ri, How To Write A Descriptive Essay About A Place, Any Moment Now Meme, Isla Bermeja, Adam Laroche Ranch, Affordable Comfort Conference, Als Ob Sätze, Hyperx Flight S, Martin V Hunter's Lessee Lexisnexis, Lord Of The Rings The Third Age Xbox One Backwards Compatibility, Why Am I Always Tired And Sleepy, Barack Obama Favorite Books, Queen Maud Land, Nicollette Sheridan Kids, Samantha Buck Married, Child Support Enforcement Is Unconstitutional,

Categorised in: Uncategorized

This post was written by