list of un resolutions

As of 2013 , Israel had been condemned in 45 resolutions by the United Nations Human Rights Council. The cases were spread across 21 states and territories, which are listed below: Algeria, Botswana, Cambodia, China, Côte d’Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, Hong Kong, Laos, Lebanon, Malaysia, Malta, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and Zambia. List Page 1 of 174 United Nations Security Council Consolidated List Generated on: 28 September 2020 "Generated on refers to the date on which the user accessed the list and not the last date of substantive update to the list. For example: 640 × 480 VGA is 921,600 subpixels, or 307,200 pixels, 800 × 600 SVGA is 1,440,000 subpixels, or 480,000 pixels, and 1024 × 768 XGA is 2,359,296 subpixels, but only 786,432 full-color pixels. China “replied to the Panel that all of its imports ‘went through the customs formalities within 30 days’ from the adoption of resolution 2397 (2017).” See: Report of the Panel of Experts established pursuant to resolution 1874 (2009), March 5, 2019, p. 148.↩, 23. Future editions of the PPI will incorporate DPRK sanction violation tabulations in the scoring.↩, . In May 2018, the aircraft manufacturer was fined by a New Zealand district court. These countries and territories included: Belize, British Virgin Islands, China, Comoros, Equatorial Guinea, Hong Kong, Panama, Russia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Taiwan, Togo, and Vietnam. The report highlighted an alleged ship-to-ship transfer case involving brokers of Indonesian nationality, and a North Korean ship, the M/V Wise Honest, off the coast of Balikpapan in Indonesia.

See: “South Korean prosecutors indict four for importing North Korean coal,” Reuters, December 10, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-southkorea-coal/south-korean-prosecutors-indict-four-for-importing-north-korean-coal-idUSKBN1O90TP↩, 17. Based on the Peddling Peril Index for 2019, the group of countries involved in alleged instances of military cooperation perform poorly overall at trade control implementation. Taken together, the two states identified were: In total, 56 states were identified as involved in alleged sanctions violations in one of the five areas discussed above.

Six states, territories, or entities were identified to have been the registered jurisdiction for companies that evaded sanctions regarding ship-to-ship transfers with vessels associated with the DPRK. Compiled at the end of the session or year, Published as part of the Official Records of the organ. The average score in the PPI of the 16 countries or territories in this sanction-violation category is 573 out of the available 1,300 points. This was a resolution renewing the mandate of UNAMA until 17 September 2021. This bit of marketing obfuscation is calculated as horizontal resolution × vertical resolution × 3. As compared to previous reports, the sanctions-violating cases in this report appear to be increasingly elaborate, involving more layers and entities.4 This development implies that North Korea has sought to adapt its sanctions-busting methods to a more challenging environment. Notably, the report highlighted the case of the V/M Kal Ma, which broadcast a false automatic identification system (AIS) signal in order to call at Chinese ports. Security Council, General Assembly, Economic and Social Council and Human Rights Council resolutions are issued as individual documents.The resolutions of the principal organs are also issued in annual or sessional compilations.. The report highlighted a case where sensitive goods were procured from abroad by the DPRK. More can be done by favored registrant states to better regulate the business registering process. These member states included Bangladesh, Germany, Indonesia, Netherlands, and Russia. The UNSC should designate, as necessary, entities identified as involved in outfitting North Korea’s illicit nuclear and missile programs, particularly trading companies that are active in China. Table 1. They should apply domestic sanctions against Russian and Chinese entities and individuals as needed. The two countries have also been involved in oil shipments to North Korea, resulting in U.S. sanctions on Chinese companies in March 2019.21, China**, Ghana**, India**, Mexico**, and Thailand, • Food, seafood, and agricultural products.

North Korean financial nodes have become well-integrated in certain jurisdictions, and the Panel documented established business relationships between North Korean entities and foreign actors. The report identified 15 states where joint ventures with the DPRK were found to have been operating. List of resolutions. This resolution extended the mandate of UNFICYP for another six months. The average PPI score of these countries is 494 out of the available score of 1,300. UN Women. One case involved a Singaporean national named Ng Kheng Wah, and a Chinese national, Wang Zhi Guo. Concerning is how many states permitted the continued, unhindered operation of these joint ventures within their territorial jurisdictions. The UN Security Council and major countries should designate additional individuals and entities outlined in the report, including banks that do business with North Korea, and those that appear as ongoing violators of UNSC resolutions on North Korea. There is no excuse for new or ongoing military cooperation with the DPRK. Encouraged Iran and the Soviet Union to resolve their conflict concerning Soviet troops occupying Iranian territory. This is shown in the pie chart in Figure 2. • Coal, iron, other minerals and related articles, China, El Salvador**, Ghana**, India**, Nicaragua, Russia, Serbia**, South Korea,16 and Thailand. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2 – passed on 30 January 1946. The total number of incidents is difficult to determine due to the structure of the Panel of Experts report.↩, 3. It also had sanctions-evasion assistance from Russia and China, as also documented in media reports. United Nations, UN The United Kingdom and Singapore ranked highly in the PPI and have a mean score of 988 out of 1,300. In this case, a disguised ship was renamed and re-flagged repeatedly to bring oil to a purported UAE end-user, but the shipment likely went to North Korea. by David Albright, Sarah Burkhard, Bernadette Gostelow, Maximilian Lim, and Andrea Stricker.

Only two countries scored more than half of the PPI’s available points and they are both subcategory 3 countries, or those that failed to prevent military-related training or services, or the supply, sale, or transfer of materiel through their territories or by their nationals (see Figure 1). Figure 2.

Security Council, General Assembly, Economic and Social Council and Human Rights Council resolutions are issued as individual documents. See, for example, our previous report on the UN Panel of Experts on North Korea’s reporting: David Albright, Sarah Burkhard, Allison Lach, and Andrea Stricker, “52 Countries Involved in Violating UNSC Resolutions on North Korea throughout most of 2017,” Institute for Science and International Security, March 9, 2018, http://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/52-countries-involved-in-violating-unsc-resolutions-on-north-korea-througho/10↩, 4. Fifteen states were mentioned in the 2019 report for alleged involvement in military-related sanctions violations. Russia and China are thwarting UNSC sanctions on North Korea with near impunity by operating black and grey market schemes to import or export coal, petroleum, and other goods. This resolution renewed the mandate of the UN Verification Mission in Colombia until 25 September 2021. For this analysis, we have chosen to also include cases where states failed to prevent or prohibit private actors from operating independently within or outside state jurisdictions. Using data and findings from another Institute study, the Peddling Peril Index for 2019 (PPI 2019), which ranks all 200 countries, territories, and entities according to the effectiveness of their strategic trade controls, we also consider these 56 countries in terms of 1) their overall score under the index, and 2) the comprehensiveness of their export control legislation, which allows for a clearer picture of the weaknesses of those involved in or caught up in alleged North Korean sanctions violations. The three subcategories and their constituent states are listed below in alphabetical order: 1. This was on the role of women in peacekeeping operations. They generally consist of two clearly defined sections: a preamble and an operative part. While illicit procurements of commodities are frequently linked to vessel and shipping-related sanctions, the Institute chose to separately discuss alleged shipping-related sanctions violations, such as the provision of a vessel, flag, insurance, or registry. Ten received less than 25 percent. The eleven states in subcategory 1, or those that procured or supplied military-related equipment and materiel, and three states in subcategory 2, or those that hosted or procured DPRK training or advisors, warrant special international scrutiny and potentially economic penalties. These 15 states were further classified into three subcategories. Remittances from North Korean workers should be stopped from going to North Korea, and countries should continue to reduce numbers of North Korean workers. UN resolutions Resolutions are formal expressions of the opinion or will of UN organs.

Inventory Management Techniques Pdf, Beyerdynamic Mmx 300 Mic Test, Sanctum Sanctorum In Tamil, Procrastination Symptoms, Barack Obama New Book Deal, Xa Country Code, Indigenous Charities Vancouver, Jessi Slaughter Birthday, European Culture Food, Ibiza Hotels All Inclusive, Barker V Wingo Quimbee, West Side Community School Vs Mergens Ruling, Are Ramen Noodles Made Of Plastic, Mitch Eakins Wiki, Mount Terror North Buttress, N95maskco Com Reviews, Miss Fisher Season 1 Episode 7, Shanann Watts Family, Gethsemane Jesus, Hydrogen Roadmap Europe,

Categorised in: Uncategorized

This post was written by